Saturday, December 28, 2013

Remembering Dr. Vishnuvardhan a Stylish actor ......on his Birthday



A young cute boy Kumar wanted to become a “ Daaku” with the inspiration he got from watching films. He was promptly sent back from Rajasthan by his elder sister for studies to Bangalore.

He roamed several places and the one liking he picked up was that of visiting to the sets of Kannada films for the sake of eating spicy tasty eatables served.

This attraction made him to attend the sets and bunk the classes. He was spotted for a small role in National award winner “ Vamshavruksha “ and later he got an opportunity of his life from the great director S.R.Puttanna Kanagal for the film “ Nagara Havu “ which was a smash hit and raked into lot of popularity for this Kumar.

Puttanna Kanagal
named him as Vishnuvardhan for this film and today he has almost spent thirty five years in filmy land.

He is the one of the most versatile, talented, stylish and popular actors in the Kannada film Industry. Be it a romantic, action, emotional, music, comedy or a family drama movie Vishuvardhan can enact them with effortless ease.

Three decades of career and a variety of popular roles in more than 175 films speak high about his calibre as an actor.

Some of his all-time hits are Naagara haavu, Bhooytayyana Maga Ayyu, Bhagya Jyoti, Bandhana, Naagara Hole, Muthina Haara,Suprabhata , Himapatha, Nishkarsha and 

After film " Bhagya Jyoti " he proposed and married  then popular actress " Bharati " and become a lovable husband all thorough out  his life


His venture into parallel cinema was in a film called “ Harakeya Kuri “ (based on Dr. Chandrashekar Kambar' s novel with same title) directed by Ravi (K.S.L.N Swamy who also directed his Malaya Maruta).

It is believed that the huge fan following of him didn't want Vishnu Vardhan to deviate from his "Star Value" and "image". He continued to don the roles of macho hero and the ideal lover husband.



after his action film "Sahasa Simha" (the lion of action) directed by Joe-Saiman , Vishnuvardhan never reverted back from his action image and he still continues at this age of 55 years.

So he became a prisoner of his own image in the later stages of his carrier and signed some insignificant films which he would have easily avoided.

He is named as Abhinaya Bhargava by his fans.

After Nagarahavu a silver jubilee film Vishnuvardhan had to wait for a long time for his second hit in Bhootayyana Maga Ayyu directed by Siddalingayya .

The films like Hombisilu, Bandhana based on novels, the hit films like Karna, Malayamarutha, Mahakshatriya, Suprabhata, Chanakya, Samraat, Halunda Thavaru possesed strong story line.

There is no doubt that Vishnuvardhan has given an above average performance in the field and has contributed significantly for the growth of Kannada cinema.

While his maiden film as hero was way back in 1972 fetched him state award, his subsequent emotional performance in Hombisilu (1977) Bandhana (1984) Lion Jagapathi Rao (1990) and in the later years brought him acclaim at the state level.

In Bhootayyana Maga Ayyu ,he has a tailor made role of Macha and angry young man in a village who always fights for the injustice and takes on the mighty power of Bhootayayya (played by Late M.P.Shankar.) the village head.

His another chilling performance came in JIMMI GALLU (though a remake) where he played an innocent villager who comes to city and becomes a victim of a conspiracy and gets “ Gallu Shikshe “ for the crime he has not done.

He has alos sang his first song in his own voice in this film ? Tuttu Anna Tinnoke , Bogase Neeru Kudiyoke ?

His best performances always came with best directors like S.V.Rajendrasing Babu and Dinesh Baboo. His performances in Dinesh Baboos films Suprabhata and Laali , can be called as Land marks in his carrier.

As a speech impaired person who learn to speak fluently by continuously talking to him self in Suprabhata was fantastic and can be done only by Vishnu.

His subdued performance as a doctor husband in Hombisilu directed by Geetapriya earned him lot of ladies fans.

He has amazing comic timing which was rarely utilized in KFI.

His first comic role as a widower in Makkala-Sainya who has four children , who marries another widow (Actress Sumitra now wife of director Late D.Rajendra Babu) who has three children’s from her first husband was a hilarious fare with equally competent performace by all the children. This film was directed by actress Laskshmi.

His other good performances came in “ Sose thanda Sowbhagya” , “Hosilu mettida Hennu” , “ Indina Ramayana” and “ Mane Mane Kathe ” .

His role of a drunkard brother loved by every body in Indina Ramayana was a revelation as well as hilarious.

He was equally good in Bhagya-Jyoti , Bangarada Gudi .

He was at his entertaining best at Kalla-Kulla, Singapuaradalli Raja-Kulla, Kiladi-Jodi, Nee Nakkare Halu Sakkare and Sahasasimha.

His another sober performance came in Rayaru-Bandaru-mavana manege .

His performance as a duty bound commando chief with golden heart in Sunilkumar Desai's " Nishkarsha " was another highlight of that movie.

Yet the artist in him has not completely come into force. His impressive performances in certain scenes in Bandhana, Suprabhata, Mutttina Hara really promised a lot. However, sadly, it has just remained a promise.

He some where in the middle missed the track completely (Probably misguided by that cunning Kulla of KFI Dwarakish) and resorted to acting in a string of remakes (which constitutes about 70% of his total films) without bothering to search for good stories and script.

He has acted in many meaning less stuff like Khaidi , Deva, Jananayaka, Naga-Kala-Bhairava, Kotigobba, Appaji, Kannada Kuvara, Sogasugara, Vishnu-Sainya Rudra naga, Satyam-shivam-sunderam, Simaha-jodi, kalinga, Onde-guri, Veeradhiveera, Jayasimha, Yama-Kinkara and many others.

His very bad move in his carrier which has cost him very dearly both in the form of popularity and fan following his foolish attempt to enter bollywood that too with crap films Vishnu-Dada and Vishnu-Vijay both produced by himself in association of that third rate director Keshu-Ramsey.

From the day one in film dom, Vishnu has been surrounded by controversies. He was called as angry young man, moody chap, and of late philosophical.

This moody nature of his and misguided by some of his associates he had broke-up with talented director like S.V.R Babu and deprived KFI some more astonishing films and performances.

Of late the though Veerappanayaka and Suryavamsha further tapped his potentiality but not fully.

Vishnuvardhan caught in the web he has woven around him or the industry, which is more commercial oriented, has failed to exploit the best in him. The absence of valuable criticism and critical writing on cinema and artists, which is a bane in Kannada cinema also seems to have become a negative factor for his growth.

Fortunately his latest film SIRIVANTHA though a remake has received rave reviews and appreciation from both the press, industry and public.

In 2004 he was awarded a Doctorate by Mysore university and he was the only second actor in KFI who has is awarded a Doctorate till then.

Though his next film Sachin directed “ Ekadanta “ did not done him any good with a miniscule role his other film Nagathi Halli Chandrashekhar directed Film “ Maatad Maatad Mallige “ in which he played a former who fights against globalization of villages to perfection received again rave reviews from both press and public and is another feather in his cap.

His another film “ Ee Bandhana “ though a remake received well by audience and show cased his talent once again in matured roles.

After this he had a lean patch with films like Nammejamanru, Bellary Naga etc failing badly at box office.

His health was always a matter of concern for him after the age of 50. He was suffering from severe diabetes and heart ailment. He had undergone a major operation to remove water from his body because of which he gained weight.

But finally Vishnuvardhan died on 30 December 2009, due to a massive cardiac arrest at King's Court Hotel in Mysore. He was survived by his wife, Bharathi Vishnuvardhan, and two adopted daughters, Keerthi and Chandana.

During his last part of life, he developed more interest in spirituality. Many of his friends say that he used to sit at home and read books on spirituality and psychology. His close associate Dr. Rajkumar’s death also affected him both mentally and physically.

His last films were “ Master “ and Apta rakshaka “ both released after his death.

While “ Master “ failed badly , Its “ Aptarakshaka “ which was second part of his earlier hit “ Apta mitra “ was a resounding success and paid a tribute to this talented actor.

He has acted in over 220 movies in total that includes 200 Kannada movies, 5 Hindi movies, 5 Telugu movies, 3 Malayalam movies and 6 Tamil movies.

This article is a tribute to this talented actor who had entertained us for nearly 30 years. May his soul rest in peace. ...

Friday, December 27, 2013

ಭಾರತ ಎ೦ದೂ ಮರೆಯ ಲಾಗದ ಮಾಜೀ ಪ್ರಧಾನಿ... " ಅಟಲ್ ಬಿಹಾರಿ ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ "

ಭಾರತ ಎ೦ದೂ ಮರೆಯ ಲಾಗದ ಮಾಜೀ ಪ್ರಧಾನಿ...
" ಅಟಲ್ ಬಿಹಾರಿ ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ "





 “ ಅಟಲ್ ಬಿಹಾರಿ ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ “ ಎ೦ಬ ಈ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಭಾರತ ರತ್ನ ಪ್ರಶಸ್ಥಿಗೆ ಅರ್ಹನೋ ಇಲ್ಲವೋ ಎ೦ಬ ವಾದದ ನಡುವೆ......ಈ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯ ಸಾಧನೆಗಳನ್ನು ನೆನಪಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಿ…..

ಕಳೆದ ವರ್ಷ "ಟೈಮ್ಸ್ ಆಫ್ ಇಂಡಿಯಾ" ಪತ್ರಿಕೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಅರವಿಂದ ಪಾನಗರಿಯಾ  ಎ೦ಬ ಪತ್ರಕರ್ತ  "A forgotten Revolutionary'' ಶೀರ್ಷಿಕೆಯಡಿ ಬರೆದ ಲೇಖನದಲ್ಲಿ " ಇನ್ನು ಐವತ್ತು ವರ್ಷಗಳ ನಂತರ ಇತಿಹಾಸಕಾರರು ಆಧುನಿಕ ಭಾರತದ ನಿರ್ಮಾತೃಗಳಾರು ಎಂಬ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಯನ್ನಿಟ್ಟುಕೊಂಡು ತುಲನೆ ಮಾಡಿದರೆ ನಮಗೆ  ಸಿಗುವ ಉತ್ತರ “ ಅಟಲ್ ಬಿಹಾರೀ ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ “ ಎ೦ದು.  

ಒಂದು ವೇಳೆ ನ್ಯಾಯ ಸಂದಿದ್ದೇ ಆದರೆ ವೇಳೆಗೆ ಇವರಿಗೆ  " ಭಾರತರತ್ನ" ನೀಡಿ ಈ ದೇಶ ಸಮ್ಮಾನಿಸ ಬೇಕಾಗಿತ್ತು  ಎಂದಿದ್ದರು.  ಹಾಗಾದರೆ ಅರವಿಂದ ಪಾನಗರಿಯಾ ಪ್ರತಿಪಾದಿಸಿದಂತೆ ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ ನಿಜಕ್ಕೂ ಭಾರತ ರತ್ನಕ್ಕೆ ಅರ್ಹರಾ ? ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ ನಮ್ಮ ದೇಶ ಕ೦ಡ ಶ್ರೇಷ್ಟ ಪ್ರಧಾನಿಯಾ..? ಈ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಗಳಿಗೆ ಉತ್ತರ ಹುಡುಕೋಣ…

ನೆನಪಿಡಿ ಒ೦ದು ದೇಶದ  ಅಭಿವ್ರದ್ದಿಗೆ  ಮುಖ್ಯ  ಕೊಡುಗೆಗಳನ್ನು ನೀಡುವುದು ಆ ದೇಶದ ರಸ್ತೆಗಳು…

ಅಮೆರಿಕದ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಗಳನ್ನು " ಫ್ರೀ ವೇಸ್ " ಎನ್ನುತ್ತಾರೆ. ಜರ್ಮನಿಯ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಗಳನ್ನು " ಅಟೋಬಾನ್ಸ್ " ಎಂದು ಕರೆಯುತ್ತಾರೆ. ಇಟಲಿಯ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಗಳಿಗೆ " ಅಟೋಸ್ಟ್ರೆಡ್ಸ್ " ಎನ್ನಲಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಹಾಗಾದರೆ ಭಾರತದ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಗಳನ್ನು ಏನೆಂದು ಕರೆಯುತ್ತಾರೆ? ಇಂಥದ್ದೊಂದು ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಯನ್ನು ನಾವು ಶಾಲೆಯಲ್ಲಿದ್ದಾಗ " ಕ್ವಿಝ್ ಕಾಂಪಿಟಿಷನ್ " ನಲ್ಲಿ ಕೇಳುತ್ತಿದ್ದರು. ಆಗ ಗ್ರ್ಯಾಂಡ ಟ್ರ೦ಕ್  ಎಂದು ಉತ್ತರಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದೆವು. ಆದರೆ, ಗ್ರಾಂಡ್ ಟ್ರಂಕ್ ಕೂಡಾ ಯಾವುದು, ಯಾರು, ಯಾವ ಕಾಲದಲ್ಲಿ ನಿರ್ಮಿಸಿದ್ದು ಎಂದು ಕೇಳಿದರೆ ಇಡೀ ದೇಶವೇ ತಲೆತಗ್ಗಿಸಬೇಕಾಗಿತ್ತು. 

ಇಷ್ಟಕ್ಕೂ ಈ ರಸ್ತೆಯನ್ನು ನಿರ್ಮಾಣ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದು ಶೇರ್ ಶಾ ಸೂರಿ, ಅದೂ 16ನೇ ಶತಮಾನದಲ್ಲಿ. ಹಾಗಿರುವಾಗ ಎತ್ತಿನ ಬಂಡಿಗಳು ನಮ್ಮ ರಸ್ತೆಯನ್ನು ಆಳುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ಕಾಲಘಟ್ಟದ ಅದನ್ನು ಯಾವ ಮಾನದಂಡದ ಮೂಲಕ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿ ಎಂದು ಹೇಳಲು ಸಾಧ್ಯವಿತ್ತು ಹೇಳಿ? 1947ರಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ವಾತಂತ್ರ್ಯ ಬಂದ ನಂತರವೂ ಪರಿಸ್ಥಿತಿ ಬದಲಾಗಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಆ ನಮ್ಮ ಮೊದಲ ಪ್ರಧಾನಿ ಜವಾಹರಲಾಲ್ ನೆಹರು ಮಹಾಶಯರು 16 ವರ್ಷ ದೇಶವನ್ನಾಳಿದರೂ, ಅವರ ಮಗಳು ಇಂದಿರಾ ಗಾಂಧಿ 15 ವರ್ಷ ಪ್ರಧಾನಿ ಗದ್ದುಗೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಮೆರೆದರೂ ಭಾರತದ ರಸ್ತೆಗಳು ಬದಲಾಗಲಿಲ್ಲ. 1998ರಲ್ಲಿ ಅಂದರೆ ಸ್ವಾತಂತ್ರ್ಯ ಬಂದು 50 ವರ್ಷಗಳು ಕಳೆದ ನಂತರವೂ ಭಾರತದಲ್ಲಿದ್ದ ಚತುಷ್ಪಥ ಅಥವಾ Four-lane ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಯ ಉದ್ದವೆಷ್ಟೆಂದರೆ ಕೇವಲ 334 ಕಿ.ಮೀ. ಎಂದರೆ ನಂಬುತ್ತೀರಾ? ಭಾರತದ ಸಂಪತ್ತನ್ನು ಸಾಗಿಸಲು ಹಾಗೂ ವ್ಯಾಪಾರ ವಹಿವಾಟಿಗೆ ಅಗತ್ಯವೆಂದು ಭಾವಿಸಿ ಶೇರ್ ಶಾ ಸೂರಿ ನಿರ್ಮಿಸಿದ ಗ್ರಾಂಡ್ ಟ್ರಂಕ್ ರಸ್ತೆ, ಅದೇ ಕಾರಣಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಬ್ರಿಟಿಷರು ಹಾಕಿದ ರೈಲು ಹಳಿಗಳನ್ನು ಬಿಟ್ಟರೆ ಈ ದೇಶದ ಸರ್ವತೋಮುಖ ಅಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿಗೆ ಸುಸಜ್ಜಿತ ರಸ್ತೆಗಳ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣದ ಅಗತ್ಯವಿದೆ ಎಂದು ಯಾರಿಗೂ ಏಕೆ ಅನಿಸಲಿಲ್ಲ? ಇಂಥದ್ದೊಂದು ಹೀನಾಯ ಪರಿಸ್ಥಿತಿ ಕೇವಲ ಕಳೆದ 15 ವರ್ಷಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಬದಲಾಗಿದ್ದು ಹೇಗೆ ?

ಭಾರತದ ರಸ್ತೆಗಳನ್ನು ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿದ ಮಹಾನ್ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಯಾರು ? ಅಟಲ್ ಬಿಹಾರಿ ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ! ಆ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಅನುಮಾನವೇ ಬೇಡ. ಆರ್ಯನ್ನರ ವಲಸೆ, ಮೊಘಲರ ಆಕ್ರಮಣ ಮತ್ತು ದರ್ಬಾರು, ಬ್ರಿಟಿಷರ ಸಾಮ್ರಾಜ್ಯಶಾಹಿತ್ವ ಇವೆಲ್ಲವೂ ಭಾರತದ ನಾಗರಿಕತೆಯ ವಿಕಾಸಕ್ಕೆ ಕಾರಣವಾದರೂ ಅಟಲ್ ರ  ಪ್ರಭಾವ ಅಮೋಘ ಬದಲಾವಣೆಗೆ ನಾಂದಿಯಾಯಿತು.

ಭಾರತದ ಆತ್ಮ ಸ್ಥೈರ್ಯದ ಗುರುತಾದ “ ಅಣು ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆ “…

1998 ರಲ್ಲಿ ಅಟಲ್ ಅಧಿಕಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಬಂದ ಕೂಡಲೇ ಮಾಡಿದ ಮೊದಲ ಕೆಲಸವೆಂದರೆ ಅಣು ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆಗೆ ಆದೇಶ. ಅದಕ್ಕೂ ಮೊದಲಿದ್ದ ಪರಿಸ್ಥಿತಿಯನ್ನು ನೆನಪಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಿ. 1962ರಲ್ಲಿ ಚೀನಾದ ಎದುರು ನಾವು ಹೀನಾಯವಾಗಿ ಸೋಲು ಅನುಭವಿಸಿ ಆತ್ಮಸ್ಥೈರ್ಯವನ್ನೇ ಕಳೆದುಕೊಂಡಿದ್ದೆವು. ಆ ಮುಖಭಂಗದ ನಂತರ ಜಗತ್ತಿನ ಎದುರು ಎದೆ ಸೆಟೆಸಿ ನಿಲ್ಲುವ ತಾಕತ್ತೇ ನಮ್ಮಿಂದ ದೂರವಾಗಿತ್ತು. ಆದರೆ, 1998 ಮೇ 11ರಂದು ಅಟಲ್ ನಡೆಸಿದ ಅಣುಪರೀಕ್ಷೆ ಇಡೀ ದೇಶವೇ ಬೀದಿಗಿಳಿದು ಪಟಾಕಿ ಸಿಡಿಸಿ, ನವೋತ್ಸಾಹ ಬೀರುವಂತೆ ಮಾಡಿತು. ಯಾವ ಆರ್ಥಿಕ ದಿಗ್ಬಂಧನೆಗೂ ಅಟಲ್ ಸೊಪ್ಪು ಹಾಕಲಿಲ್ಲ. 1974ರಲ್ಲೇ ನಾವು ಅಣುಪರೀಕ್ಷೆ ನಡೆಸಿದ್ದರೂ ಅದರ ಯೋಗ್ಯಾಯೋಗ್ಯತೆ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಅನುಮಾನಗಳಿದ್ದವು. ಆದರೆ 1998ರ ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆ ಭಾರತ ಕೂಡ ಒಂದು ಕ್ರೆಡಿಬಲ್ ನ್ಯೂಕ್ಲಿಯರ್ ರ್ಪವರ್ ಎಂಬುದನ್ನು ನಿರೂಪಿಸಿತು.  

ಶತ್ರುಗಳನ್ನು ಹಿಮ್ಮೆಟ್ಟಿಸಿದ “ ಕ್ಲಾರ್ಗಿಲ್ ಯುದ್ದ “…

ಪಾಕಿಸ್ತಾನೀ ಸೈನಿಕರು ೧೯೯೯ ರಲ್ಲಿ ಕಾಶ್ಮೀರ್ ಕಣಿವೆಯನ್ನು ಅತಿಕ್ರಮಿಸಿ  ಕಾರ್ಗಿಲ್ ಎ೦ಬ ಊರಿನ ಹತ್ತಿರ ಬೀಡು ಬಿಟ್ಟು ಭಾರತಕ್ಕೆ ಸವಾಲೆಸೆದಾಗ  ಅಟಲ್ ಬಿಹಾರೀ ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ ಯವರ ನೇತ್ರತ್ವದಲ್ಲಿ ತಯಾರಾಗಿದ್ದೇ “ ಆಪರೇಷನ್ ವಿಜಯ್ “ ಎ೦ಬ ಪಾಕಿಗಳನ್ನು ಹಿಮ್ಮೆಟ್ಟಿಸುವ ಯೋಜನೆ. ಅ೦ದು ನಮ್ಮ ಸೈನಿಕರು ಅತ್ಯ೦ತ ಕಠಿಣ ಪ್ರದೇಶಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರತಿಕೂಲ ಹವಾಮಾನದಲ್ಲಿ ಅಸಾಧಾರಣ ಸಾಹಸ ಮೆರೆದು ಪಾಕಿಗಳನ್ನು ಸೋಲಿಸಿ ಆಕ್ರಮಿತ ಪ್ರದೇಶಗಳನ್ನು ಹಿ೦ದೆ ಪಡೆದು ವಿಜಯಪತಾಕೆ ನೆಟ್ಟರು. ಈ ವಿಜಯ ಅ೦ತರಾಷ್ಟ್ರೀಯ ಮಟ್ಟದಲ್ಲಿ ವಾಜಪೇಯಿಯವರ ಇಮೇಜ್ ಬೆಳೆಸಲು ಸಹಾಯಕವಾಯಿತು.

 ವಿಜ್ನ್ಯಾನಕ್ಕೆ...ವಿಜ್ನ್ಯಾನಿಗಳಿಗೆ  ಮನ್ನಣೆ...
ಲಾಲ್ ಬಹದ್ದೂರ್ ಶಾಸ್ತ್ರಿಯವರ, " ಜೈ ಜವಾನ್, ಜೈ ಕಿಸಾನ್ " ಗೆ ಅಟಲ್ " ಜೈ ವಿಜ್ಞಾನ್ " ಸೇರಿಸಿದರು. ಈ ದೇಶ ಅಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಕಾಣಬೇಕಾದರೆ ವಿಜ್ಞಾನಕ್ಕೆ ಮೊದಲ ಆದ್ಯತೆ ನೀಡಬೇಕೆಂಬುದನ್ನು ಮನದಟ್ಟು ಮಾಡಿಕೊಟ್ಟರು. ಹಾಗಂತ ಅಟಲ್ ಬಡಾಯಿ ಕೊಚ್ಚಿಕೊಳ್ಳುವುದರಲ್ಲೇ ಕಾಲಹರಣ ಮಾಡಲಿಲ್ಲ. 1999ರಲ್ಲಿ ದೇಶದ 4 ಮಹಾನಗರಗಳಾದ ದೆಹಲಿ, ಮುಂಬೈ, ಕೋಲ್ಕತಾ ಹಾಗೂ ಚೆನ್ನೈ ಹೀಗೆ ದೇಶದ ನಾಲ್ಕೂ ಮೂಲೆಗಳಿಗೆ ಸಂಪರ್ಕ ಕಲ್ಪಿಸುವಂಥ ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರೀಯ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣಕ್ಕೆ ಮುಂದಾದರು. ಒಂದು ದೇಶ ಬದಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ, ಅಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಹೊಂದುತ್ತಿದೆ ಎಂದು ಬಹಳ ವಿಸಿಬಲ್ ಆಗಿ ಕಾಣುವುದೇ ರಸ್ತೆಗಳಲ್ಲಿ. ಅದಕ್ಕಾಗಿಯೇ ನಾಲ್ಕು ಹಾಗೂ 6 ಪಥಗಳನ್ನು ಹೊಂದಿರುವ "Golden Quadrilateral'' ಅಥವಾ ಸುವರ್ಣ ಚತುಷ್ಪಥದ ನೀಲನಕ್ಷೆ ರೂಪಿಸಿದರು! ಅದು 13 ರಾಜ್ಯಗಳ ಮೂಲಕ ಹಾದುಹೋಗುವ, ದೇಶದ 75 ಪ್ರಮುಖ ನಗರಗಳನ್ನು ಸ್ಪರ್ಶಿಸುವ 5,846 ಕಿ. ಮೀಟರ್ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಯಾಗಿತ್ತು. ದಯವಿಟ್ಟು ನೆನಪಿಡಿ, ಸ್ವಾತಂತ್ರ್ಯ ಬಂದ ನಂತರದ 50 ವರ್ಷಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣವಾಗಿದ್ದು ಕೇವಲ 334 ಕಿ.ಮೀಟರ್, ಅಟಲ್ ಕೇವಲ 4 ವರ್ಷಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಅಂದರೆ 2003 ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ನೊಳಗೆ ಪೂರ್ಣಗೊಳಿಸಲು ಹೊರಟಿದ್ದು 5,846 ಕಿ.ಮೀಟರ್ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿ!! ಅದಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಅಧಿಕಾರಶಾಹಿಗಳ ಜಂಜಾಟವೇ ಇಲ್ಲದ ಹೊಸ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಯನ್ನೇ ರೂಪಿಸಿದರು, ತ್ವರಿತವಾಗಿ ಭೂ ಸ್ವಾಧೀನ ನಡೆಯಿತು. ಅದರ ಹೊಣೆಗಾರಿಕೆಯನ್ನು ಸಾರಿಗೆ ಸಚಿವರಾಗಿದ್ದ ತಮ್ಮ ಆಪ್ತ ಸ್ನೇಹಿತ ಹಾಗೂ ಮಾಜಿ ಮೇಜರ್ ಜನರಲ್ ಬಿ.ಸಿ. ಖಂಡೂರಿಯವರಿಗೆ ವಹಿಸಿದರು. ಇಷ್ಟೊಂದು ವ್ಯಾಪ್ತಿಯ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಯನ್ನು ಕೇವಲ 4 ವರ್ಷಗಳೊಳಗೆ ಪೂರ್ಣಗೊಳಿಸುವ ಸಲುವಾಗಿ ತುಂಡುಗುತ್ತಿಗೆ ನೀಡಿದರು, ನೀವು ದುಡ್ಡೊಂದನ್ನೇ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿಲ್ಲ, ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣ ಕಾರ್ಯವನ್ನೂ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದೀರಿ (You are not only making money, you are building a nation) ಎಂಬುದನ್ನು ಮರೆಯಬೇಡಿ ಎಂದು ಕಾಂಟ್ರ್ಯಾಕ್ಟರ್ಗಳಿಗೆ ಕಿವಿಮಾತು ಹೇಳುವ ಮೂಲಕ ಹೊಣೆಗಾರಿಕೆಯನ್ನು ತುಂಬಲು ಯತ್ನಿಸಿದರು. ಪರೋಕ್ಷ ಎಚ್ಚರಿಕೆಯೂ ಅದರಲ್ಲಿತ್ತು. ಈ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಯ ಒಟ್ಟು ವೆಚ್ಚವನ್ನು 60 ಸಾವಿರ ಕೋಟಿ ಎಂದು ಅಂದಾಜು ಮಾಡಲಾಯಿತು. ಆದರೆ, ಅದು 2011ರಲ್ಲಿ ಪೂರ್ಣಗೊಂಡಾಗ ಖರ್ಚಾಗಿದ್ದು 30,858 ಕೋಟಿ ಮಾತ್ರ!  ಇದನ್ನು ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಸರಕಾರದ  " ಕಾಮನ್ ವೆಲ್ಥ ಗೇಮ್ಸ ಹಗರಣ " (CWG Scam ) ಕ್ಕೆ ಹೋಲಿಸಿ..

ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಗಳು ಮಾತ್ರವಲ್ಲ, ಗ್ರಾಮಗಳತ್ತಲೂ ಅಟಲ್ ಮುಖ ಮಾಡಿದರು. ಅವರು ಜಾರಿಗೆ ತಂದ ಪ್ರಧಾನ್ಮಂತ್ರಿ ಗ್ರಾಮ್ ಸಡಕ್ ಯೋಜನೆ ದೇಶದ ಮೂಲೆ ಮೂಲೆಯ ಹಳ್ಳಿ ಹಳ್ಳಿಗಳ ರಸ್ತೆಗಳನ್ನು ಬದಲಿಸಿಬಿಟ್ಟಿತು. ಪಾಶ್ಚಿಮಾತ್ಯರಲ್ಲಿ Time equals money ಎಂಬ ಮಾತಿದೆ. ಅದನ್ನು ಭಾರತದಲ್ಲಿ ಮನಗಂಡವರು ಮತ್ತು ರಸ್ತೆ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣದ ಮೂಲಕ ಅದನ್ನು ವಾಸ್ತವದಲ್ಲಿ ಚಾಲ್ತಿಗೆ ತಂದವರು ಅಟಲ್ ಹಾಗೂ ಅಟಲ್ ಮಾತ್ರ. ರಸ್ತೆ, ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣದಿಂದ ಸರಕು ಸಾಗಣೆ, ವ್ಯಾಪಾರ ವಹಿವಾಟು ಚುರುಕುಗೊಂಡಿತು, ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿ ಬದಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಹೋಟೆಲ್ ಉದ್ಯಮ ಕೂಡ ಬೆಳೆಯಿತು, ಭೂಮಿಗೂ ಬೆಲೆ ಬಂತು, ಮಹಾನಗರಗಳ ಹೊರವಲಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಸುಸಜ್ಜಿತ ಉಪನಗರಗಳು ನಿರ್ಮಾಣಗೊಂಡವು. ಅದರಿಂದ ಸಾಫ್ಟ್ವೇರ್ ಹಾಗೂ ಸರ್ವಿಸ್ ಇಂಡಸ್ಟ್ರಿಗೂ ಉತ್ತೇಜನ ದೊರೆಯಿತು. 

 ಭಾರತದ ಮಹಾನದಿಗಳ ಜೋಡಣಾ ಯೋಜನೆ ...

ಇದರ ನಡುನಡುವೆಯೇ ಅಟಲ್ ತಲೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಹೊಸದೊಂದು ಯೋಜನೆ ರೂಪ ಪಡೆಯುತ್ತಿತ್ತು! ಅದೇ ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರೀಯ ನದಿ ಜೋಡಣೆ ಯೋಜನೆ (NRLPU). ಹಿಮಾಲಯದ ವ್ಯಾಪ್ತಿಯಿಂದ ಹುಟ್ಟಿ ಬರುವ ಉತ್ತರ ಭಾರತದ 14 ನದಿಗಳನ್ನು ಕೊಲ್ಲಿ ಸೇರುವ ದಕ್ಷಿಣ ಭಾರತದ 16 ನದಿಗಳೊಂದಿಗೆ ಸೇರಿಸುವ ಯೋಜನೆ ಅದಾಗಿತ್ತು!! ಅದಕ್ಕೆ ತಗುಲುವ ವೆಚ್ಚ 5 ಲಕ್ಷ ಕೋಟಿ ಎಂದು ಅಂದಾಜು ಮಾಡಲಾಯಿತು. 2002ರಲ್ಲಿ ಇಂಥದ್ದೊಂದು ಯೋಜನೆಯ ಪ್ರಸ್ತಾಪವನ್ನಿಟ್ಟ ಅಟಲ್, ಬಿಜೆಪಿ, ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್, ಶಿವಸೇನೆ, ಟಿಡಿಪಿ ಎಲ್ಲ ಪಕ್ಷಗಳ ಮುಖ್ಯಮಂತ್ರಿಗಳನ್ನೂ ಒಂದೆಡೆ ಸೇರಿಸಿ ಒಪ್ಪಿಗೆ ಪಡೆದುಕೊಂಡರು. ಅದರ ಅನುಷ್ಠಾನದ ಉಸ್ತುವಾರಿಯನ್ನು ಸುರೇಶ್ ಪ್ರಭು ಅವರಿಗೆ ವಹಿಸಿದರು. 2004ರಲ್ಲಿ ಯೋಜನೆಯ ಆರಂಭ ಹಾಗೂ 2016ರಲ್ಲಿ ಪೂರ್ಣ ಎಂದು ಸಮಯವನ್ನೂ ನಿಗದಿ ಮಾಡಿದರು. 

ಆದರೆ 2004ರಲ್ಲಿ ಅಧಿಕಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಬಂದ ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್, ಈ ಮಹಾತ್ವಾಕಾಂಕ್ಷಿ ಯೋಜನೆಯ ಕತ್ತನ್ನೇ ಹಿಸುಕಿತು. ಈ ವಿಚಾರ ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ನ ಗಮನಕ್ಕೆ ಬಂತು. ಮನಮೋಹನ್ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಧೂರ್ತತೆಯ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಕುಪಿತಗೊಂಡ ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಮುಖ್ಯ ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂರ್ತಿ ಎಸ್.ಎಚ್. ಕಪಾಡಿಯಾ ನೇತೃತ್ವದ ತ್ರಿಸದಸ್ಯ ಪೀಠ 2012, ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 27ರಂದು ನೀಡಿದ ತೀರ್ಪಿನಲ್ಲಿ 2016ರೊಳಗೆ ಯೋಜನೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಷ್ಠಾನಗೊಳಿಸಬೇಕೆಂದು ಕೇಂದ್ರ ಸರ್ಕಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಕಟ್ಟುನಿಟ್ಟಾದ ಸೂಚನೆ ನೀಡಿದೆ. ಜತೆಗೆ ಉನ್ನತ ಮಟ್ಟದ ಸಮಿತಿಯನ್ನೂ ರಚಿಸಿದೆ. ಒಂದು ವೇಳೆ ಅಟಲ್ ಕನಸಿನ ಈ ಯೋಜನೆ ಅನುಷ್ಠಾನಗೊಂಡರೆ ಈ ದೇಶದ ಶೇ.80ರಷ್ಟು ನೀರಾವರಿ ಸಮಸ್ಯೆ ಶಾಶ್ವತವಾಗಿ ಪರಿಹಾರವಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. 


ಎಲ್ಲರಿಗೂ ಕೈ ಗೆಟುಕಿದ  ವಾಸಕ್ಕೆ ಮನೆ….ಹೌಸಿಂಗ್ ಲೋನ್/ಮನೆ ಕಟ್ಟಲು ಸಾಲದ ಮೂಲಕ...ಅಟಲ್ ರ ಇನ್ನೊ೦ದು ಸಾಧನೆ...

ಇನ್ನು  ( ಮನೆ ಕಟ್ಟಿ, ಮದುವೆ ಮಾಡಿ ನೋಡು ಎಂಬ ಮಾತಿದೆ ). ವಾಸಕ್ಕೆ ಒ೦ದು ಮನೆ ಕಟ್ಟುವಲ್ಲಿ ಮಂದಿ ಹೈರಾಣವಾಗಿ ಬಿಡುತ್ತಾರೆ. ಆರ್ಥಿಕ ಉದಾರೀಕರಣ ನೀತಿಗಳನ್ನು ಜಾರಿಗೆ ತರುವ ಮೊದಲು ಮನೆ ಕಟ್ಟುವುದೆಂದರೆ ನಿವೃತ್ತಿಯಾದ ನಂತರ ಬರುವ ಪಿಎಫ್, ಗ್ರಾಚ್ಯುಟಿಯಿಂದ ಎಂದಾಗಿತ್ತು. ಹಾಗೆ ಬಂದ ಹಣದಲ್ಲಿ ಮನೆ ಕಟ್ಟಿ ನೆಮ್ಮದಿಯಾಗಿ ಕೊನೆಕಾಲ ಕಳೆಯಬೇಕು, ಅಲ್ಲಿಯವರೆಗೂ ದನದಂತೆ ದುಡಿಯುವುದೊಂದೇ ಮಾರ್ಗ ಎಂಬ ನಂಬಿಕೆಯಿತ್ತು. ಇಂಥದ್ದೊಂದು ಕಲ್ಪನೆಯನ್ನು ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿದವರೇ ಅಟಲ್. 

ಒಂದು ಕಡೆ ನಮ್ಮ ಆಗಸ ಅಥವಾ ವಾಯುಯಾನವನ್ನು ಖಾಸಗಿಯವರಿಗೆ ತೆರೆದರೆ, ಮತ್ತೊಂದೆಡೆ " ಪ್ರಯಾರಿಟಿ ಸೆಕ್ಟರ್ ಲೆಂಡಿಂಗ್ "ನಡಿ  ಹೌಸಿ೦ಗ್ ಲೋನ್  ಅನ್ನು ಕಡ್ಡಾಯ ಮಾಡಿ ಬ್ಯಾಂಕ್ಗಳು ವ್ಯಾಪಕವಾಗಿ ಮನೆ ಸಾಲ ನೀಡುವಂತೆ ಮಾಡಿದರು. ಸರ್ಕಾರಿ ನೌಕರರು ಮಾತ್ರವಲ್ಲ, ಖಾಸಗಿ ಹಾಗೂ ಸ್ವಉದ್ಯೋಗಿಗಳಿಗೂ ಮರುಪಾವತಿ ಸಾಮರ್ಥಕ್ಕೆ ಅನುಗುಣವಾಗಿ ಸಾಲ ದೊರೆಯುವಂತೆ ಮಾಡಿದರು. ಇಪ್ಪತ್ತಾರು, ಇಪ್ಪತ್ತೆಂಟು ವರ್ಷದ ಯುವಕ/ಯುವತಿಯರೂ ಕಂತಿನ ಸಾಲ ಪಡೆದು ಸ್ವಂತ ಮನೆಯ ಕನಸು ಕಾಣುವಂತಾಯಿತು, ಶೇ.6ರ ಬಡ್ಡಿ ದರದಲ್ಲಿ ಸಾಲ ಸಿಗುತ್ತಿತ್ತು. ಅದರಿಂದಾಗಿ ಕನ್ಸ್ಟ್ರಕ್ಷನ್ ಕ್ಷೇತ್ರಕ್ಕೆ ದೊಡ್ಡ ಚಾಲನೆ ದೊರೆಯಿತು. 

ಎಷ್ಟೋ ಬಾರಿ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯ ನಾಯಕರು, ಒಳ್ಳೆಯ ಕೆಲಸ ಮಾಡಿದವರು ಚುನಾವಣೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸೋತುಬಿಡುತ್ತಾರೆ.ದುರ್ಭಾಗ್ಯವೆ೦ದರೆ ಅಟಲ್ ರ ಆಡಳಿತ ದಲ್ಲಿ ದೇಶ ಸತತ ಮೂರು ವರ್ಷ ಬರ ಎದುರಿಸಿತು. ಅದರಿಂದ ವ್ಯತಿರಿಕ್ತ ಪರಿಣಾಮವುಂಟಾಯಿತು. ಚುನಾವಣೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಗೆಲ್ಲಲು ಒಳ್ಳೆಯ ಕೆಲಸಕ್ಕಿಂತ ಇನ್ನುಳಿದ ಲೆಕ್ಕಾಚಾರಗಳೇ ಬಹಳಷ್ಟು ಸಲ ಪ್ರಮುಖಪಾತ್ರ ವಹಿಸುತ್ತವೆ.
ಅಣಕವೆಂದರೆ, 2004ರ ಸಾರ್ವತ್ರಿಕ ಚುನಾವಣೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಗೆದ್ದಿದ್ದು 145 ಸೀಟುಗಳಾದರೆ, ಬಿಜೆಪಿ 138 ಸ್ಥಾನಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಗೆದ್ದಿತ್ತು. ಆದರೆ ನಮ್ಮ " ಸೆಕ್ಯೂಲರ್ ಮಾಧ್ಯಮಗಳು ಸೋನಿಯಾ ಗಾಂಧಿಯವರೇ ವಿಜಯಿಯೆಂದು ಬಿಂಬಿಸಿದವು. ಮಿತ್ರಪಕ್ಷಗಳ ಆಯ್ಕೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಬಿಜೆಪಿ ಎಡವಿತ್ತು ಅಷ್ಟೇ. ಇದೇನೇ ಇರಲಿ, ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ ಸರ್ಕಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಎಂಥೆಂಥ ಮಂತ್ರಿಗಳಿದ್ದರೆಂದರೆ ಸುರೇಶ್ ಪ್ರಭು, ಖಂಡೂರಿ, ರಾಮ್ನಾಯ್ಕ್, ಅರುಣ್ ಜೇಟ್ಲಿ, ಅರುಣ್ ಶೌರಿ, ಮುರಸೋಳಿ ಮಾರನ್, ಜಸ್ವಂತ್ ಸಿಂಗ್ ಮುಂತಾದವರಿದ್ದರು. 

ಮನಮೋಹನ್ ಸಿಂಗ್ ಸರ್ಕಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಇಂತಹ ಒಬ್ಬ ಯೋಗ್ಯ ಹಾಗೂ ಜನಪರ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ ಇದ್ದರೆ ಹೆಸರಿಸಿ ನೋಡೋಣ? ಜನರ ಮೂಗಿಗೆ ತುಪ್ಪ ಒರೆಸುವ ಕೆಲಸ ಬಿಟ್ಟರೆ ದೇಶದ ಪ್ರಗತಿಗೆ ಕಾರಣವಾಗುವ ಇಂಥ ಒಂದು ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮ, ಯೋಜನೆಯನ್ನು ಕಳೆದ 8 ವರ್ಷಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಸೋನಿಯಾ ಗಾಂಧಿ ನಿಯಂತ್ರಿತ ಕೇಂದ್ರ ಸರ್ಕಾರ ಜಾರಿಗೆ ತಂದಿರುವ ಉದಾಹರಣೆ ಕೊಡಿ ನೋಡೋಣ? ನಿಮಗೆ ಗೊತ್ತಾ, ಕಳೆದ 30 ವರ್ಷಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಭಾರತದಲ್ಲಿ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣವಾದ ಹೆದ್ದಾರಿಯ ಒಟ್ಟು ಉದ್ದ 47, 795 ಕಿ.ಮೀ. ಅದರಲ್ಲಿ ಶೇ.50ರಷ್ಟು ಅಂದರೆ 23,814 ಕಿ.ಮೀ. ನಿರ್ಮಾಣ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದು ವಾಜಪೇಯಿಯವರ 6 ವರ್ಷಗಳ ಸರ್ಕಾರ! ಯುಪಿಎ 10 ವರ್ಷಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದು ಕೇವಲ 16 ಸಾವಿರ ಕಿ.ಮೀ. 

ಸರ್ವ ಶಿಕ್ಷಣ ಅಭಿಯಾನ ... 
ಇವತ್ತು ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ಸಿಗರು ರೈಟ್ ಟು ಎಜುಕೇಜುಕೇಶನ್ ಎಂದು ಬೊಬ್ಬೆ ಹಾಕುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಆದರೆ ಅದು ಅಟಲ್ ದೇಶದ 576 ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಆರಂಭಿಸಿದ ಸರ್ವ ಶಿಕ್ಷಾ ಅಭಿಯಾನ ದ ಹೊಸ ಅವತಾರವಷ್ಟೇ. ಇನ್ನು ಅಟಲ್ ಗದ್ದುಗೆಯಿಂದಿಳಿದಾಗ ದೇಶದ ಆರ್ಥಿಕ ಅಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ದರವನ್ನು ಶೇ.4.2ರಿಂದ 8.4ಕ್ಕೇರಿಸಿ(2003-2004) ಹೋಗಿದ್ದರು. ಅಧಿಕಾರ ಕಳೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವ ಹಂತಕ್ಕೆ ಬಂದಿರುವ ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಅದನ್ನು ಶೇ.5ಕ್ಕಿಂತ ಕಡಿಮೆಗೆ ಇಳಿಸಿ, ಅರ್ಥ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಯನ್ನು ಹಾಳುಗೆಡವಿ ಹೊರನಡೆಯಲಿದೆ. 

 ಮಾಹಿತೀ ಸ್ವಾತ೦ತ್ರ್ಯ ...

ಇನ್ನೊಂದು ಬಹುಮುಖ್ಯ ವಿಷಯ ಕೇಳಿ, ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಹಕ್ಕು ಕಾಯಿದೆಯನ್ನು ತಂದಿದ್ದೇ ನಾವು ಎಂದು ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ಸಿಗರು ಬೊಬ್ಬೆಹಾಕುತ್ತಾರೆ. ಆದರೆ ವಾಸ್ತವದಲ್ಲಿ 2003ರಲ್ಲಿ ಅಟಲ್ ಸರ್ಕಾರ ಹೊರತಂದ " ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಪಡೆಯುವ ಸ್ವಾತಂತ್ರ್ಯ"  ವೇ ( ಫ್ರೀಡಂ ಆಫ್ ಇನ್ಫರ್ಮೇಶನ್ ) 2005ರಲ್ಲಿ ಕಾಯಿದೆಯಾಯಿತು ಅಷ್ಟೇ. 

ಬಹುತೇಕ ಸ್ಥಿರವಾಗಿದ್ದ ರೂಪಾಯಿ ಮೌಲ್ಯ ... 
ಅಟಲ್ ಅವಧಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಅಂದರೆ 1998-2004ವರೆಗೂ ನಮ್ಮ ರೂಪಾಯಿ ಮೌಲ್ಯ ಕುಸಿದಿದ್ದು ಕೇವಲ 4 ರೂಪಾಯಿ (41.25-45.31). ಆದರೆ ಅರ್ಥಶಾಸ್ತ್ರಜ್ಞ ಮನಮೋಹನ್ ಸಿಂಗ್ ಅವರ ಒಂಭತ್ತೂವರೆ ವರ್ಷ ಆಡಳಿತದಲ್ಲಿ ರೂಪಾಯಿ ಮೌಲ್ಯ 21 ರೂ.ವರೆಗೂ ಕುಸಿದು ಈಗ 17-18 ರೂ.ಗಳ ಆಸುಪಾಸಿನಲ್ಲಿದ್ದು, ಜನ ಹಾಗೂ ಅರ್ಥ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಯನ್ನು ಹೈರಾಣಾಗಿಸಿದೆ.

ಇಂತಹ ಸಂದರ್ಭದಲ್ಲಾದರೂ ನಮ್ಮ ಪತ್ರಕರ್ತ ಮಹಾಶಯರಲ್ಲಿ ಕೆಲವರಾದರೂ ಸೋನಿಯಾ ಭಜನೆಯನ್ನು ಬಿಟ್ಟು ವಾಜಪೇಯಿಯವರನ್ನು ನೆನಪಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರಲ್ಲಾ, ಅವರು ಮಹಾನ್ ಪ್ರಧಾನಿ ಎನ್ನುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರಲ್ಲಾ ಅಷ್ಟೇ ಸಮಾಧಾನ..! 

ಈಗ  ಹೇಳಿ  ಶ್ರೀ ಅಟಲ್ ಬಿಹಾರಿ ವಾಜಪೇಯಿ ಭಾರತ ರತ್ನ ಪ್ರಶಸ್ತಿ ಗೆ ಅರ್ಹರಲ್ಲವೇ ?

Sunday, November 17, 2013

ನರೇ೦ದ್ರ ಮೋದಿ  ಕೋಮುವಾದಿಯಾ , ನರ ಹ೦ತಕನಾ ?...ಏನಿದೆ ಆತನಿಗೆ ದೇಶದ ಮು೦ದಿನ ಪ್ರಧಾನಿ ಯಾಗಲು ಅರ್ಹತೆ...?


ನರೇ೦ದ್ರ ಮೋದಿ ಯನ್ನು ನರಹ೦ತಕ, ಕೋಮುವಾದಿ, ರಕ್ತ ಪಿಪಾಸು ಎ೦ದೆಲ್ಲ ಮಾಧ್ಯಮ ದೆದುರು ಜರಿದು ಜನರ ದಾರಿ ತಪ್ಪಿಸುತ್ತಿರುವ  ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಪಕ್ಷದ ಹುನ್ನಾರಿಗೆ ...ಉತ್ತರ ಇಲ್ಲಿದೆ...

ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಹೇಳುತ್ತಿರುವುದು ಸತ್ಯವಾಗಿದ್ದರೆ...ಈ ನರೇ೦ದ್ರ ಮೋದಿಯನ್ನು ಗುಜರಾತಿನ ಶಾ೦ತಿಪ್ರೀಯ ಜನ  ನಾಲ್ಕು ಸಲ ಅದೂ ಸತತವಾಗಿ ಆರಿಸಿ ಕಳುಹಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದರೇ...ಅದರಲ್ಲೂ ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಹೇಳುವ೦ತೆ...ಗೋಧ್ರಾ ಹತ್ಯಾಕಾ೦ಡದ ನ೦ತರ...?


ನಿಜ ಸ೦ಗತಿಗಳು ಇಲ್ಲಿವೆ ಓದಿ....

ಗುಜರಾತ್  ಎ೦ಬ ರಾಜ್ಯ...ಮೋದಿ ನಾಯಕತ್ವದಲ್ಲಿ ಬದಲಾದ ಬಗೆ....

೧. ಭಾರತದ ಅರ್ಥವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಗೆ ಅತಿಹೆಚ್ಚು ಕೊಡುಗೆ ನೀಡುವುದೇ ಗುಜರಾತಿಗಳು...

೨. ಅತ್ಯುತ್ತಮ ರಸ್ತೆಗಳು, ಅತಿ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ಬಂಡವಾಳ ಹೂಡಿಕೆ, ಅತ್ಯಂತ ಸುಧಾರಿತ ಹಾಗೂ ಪ್ರಗತಿಪರ ಕೃಷಿ ಚಟುವಟಿಕೆ, ಅತಿ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ಮಹಿಳಾ ಸಶಕ್ತೀಕರಣ, ಮಕ್ಕಳ ಶಿಕ್ಷಣದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಗಮನ, ಅತಿ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ಹಾಲು ಉತ್ಪಾದನೆ, ಅತಿ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ವಿದ್ಯುತ್ ಉತ್ಪಾದನೆ... ಹೀಗೆ ಗುಜರಾತ್ ಸಾಧನೆಯ ಪಟ್ಟಿ ಬೆಳೆಯುತ್ತಲೇ ಹೋಗುತ್ತದೆ...

೪. ಇದೆಲ್ಲದರ ಮೇಲೆ ಅತ್ಯ೦ತ ಭಾರತ ದೇಶದಲ್ಲಿ ಅತ್ಯ೦ತ ಕಡಿಮೆ ಹಗರಣ ಗಳುಳ್ಳ ಸರಕಾರ ಮೋದಿಯದು...

೫. ಕಳೆದ ದಶಕದಲ್ಲಿ ಭಾರತದ ರಾಜ್ಯಗಳಲ್ಲೇ ಅತ್ಯ೦ತ ಕಡಿಮೆ ಕೋಮು ಗಲಭೆಗಳಾದದ್ದು ...ಗುಜರಾತ್ ನಲ್ಲೇ..( ಈ ಅ೦ಕಿ ಅ೦ಶಗಳು ...ನರೇ೦ದ್ರ ಸಿ೦ಗ ಮೋದಿಯನ್ನು  ಕೋಮುವಾದಿ  ಎ೦ದು ಜರೆಯುವ ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ನ ಮುಖಕ್ಕೆ ಬಾರಿಸಿದ೦ತಿವೆ )

೩. ನರೇ೦ದ್ರ ಮೋದಿಯ ಕನಸಿನ ಕೂಸು " ಧೋಲೇರಾ  " ಎ೦ಬ ಮೆಗಾಸಿಟಿ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣ ವಾದೊಡನೆ ( ಇದು ಜಗತ್ತಿನ ಅತ್ಯ೦ತ ಸುಧಾರಿತ ಮತ್ತು ನವೀನ ತಾ೦ತ್ರಿಕತೆಯ ಸೌಲಭ್ಯ ಗಳಿರುವ ...ಇಡೀ ಜಗತ್ತೇ ಅಚ್ಚರಿ ಪಡುವ೦ತೆ ನಿರ್ಮಾಣ ವಾಗುತ್ತಿರುವ ನಗರ )...ಇಡೀ ಜಗತ್ತಿನ ಪ್ರಚ೦ಡ ಉದ್ದಿಮೆದಾರರೆಲ್ಲ ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಹೂಡಿಕೆ ಮಾಡಲಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಈಗಾಗಲೇ ಇವರಲ್ಲಿ ಕೆಲವರು ಮು೦ಗಡ ಜಾಗಕ್ಕೆ ಬುಕ್ಕಿ೦ಗ್ ಕೂಡ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಇದು ನಿಜವಾದರೆ ಈ ನಗರ ಭಾರತ ದೇಶದ ಅರ್ಥಿಕ ಪ್ರಗತಿಗೆ ಹೊಸ ಬಲ ತ೦ದು ಕೊಡಲಿದೆ...ಈ ವಿಡಿಯೋ ನೋಡಿ...  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lleXUM7upt4


ಏನದು ಗೋದ್ರಾ ? ಏನದರ ಹಕೀಕತ್ತು...? ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಪಕ್ಷ ಮುಚ್ಚಿಡುತ್ತಿರುವ ಸತ್ಯಗಳು...?

ನರೇಂದ್ರ ಮೋದಿಯನ್ನು ಕೋಮುವಾದಿ , ನರಹ೦ತಕ ಎ೦ದು ಮಾತಿಗೊಮ್ಮೆ ಜರೆಯುತ್ತಾ  ಅದಕ್ಕೆ ಗೋದ್ರಾ ಹತ್ಯಾಕಾ೦ಡವನ್ನು ಉದಾಹರಣೆ ಕೊಡುವ ಕಾ೦ಗೆಸ್ ಪಕ್ಷ ಮುಚ್ಚಿಡುತ್ತಿರುವ ಸತ್ಯಗಳಾವವು...?

ಮಾಧ್ಯಮಗಳು ನಮ್ಮ ಗಮನವನ್ನು ಒಂದೇ ಕಡೆ ನೆಡಲು ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ಏಕಮಾತ್ರ ವಿಷಯ ಗೋಧ್ರಾ! ಅದೇನದು? ಹಿಂಸಾಚಾರವೇ? ಬಹುಶಃ ಸಾವಿರಕ್ಕೂ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ನಮ್ಮ ಮುಸಲ್ಮಾನ ಸಹೋದರರನ್ನು ಮೋದಿ ಸ್ವತಃ ಕೊಂದುಹಾಕಿರಬಹುದಾ ? ..... ನೀವು ಅಂದುಕೊಂಡ ಹಾಗೇನು ಅಲ್ಲ ,  ಮೋದಿ ಆ ಸಂದರ್ಭದಲ್ಲಿ ಮುಖ್ಯಮಂತ್ರಿಯಾಗಿದ್ದರು ಅಷ್ಟೇ . .  "ಅವರು ಯಾರನ್ನಾದರೂ ಕೊಂದರೆ?". "ಇಲ್ಲ, ಗುಜರಾತ್ ಹಿಂಸಾಚಾರದಲ್ಲಿ ಮೋದಿ ಭಾಗಿಯಾಗಿದ್ದರು ಎಂಬುದಕ್ಕೆ ಇದುವರೆಗೂ ಯಾವುದೇ ಆಧಾರಗಳು ಸಿಕ್ಕಿಲ್ಲ".  ಅಲ್ಲದೆ  " 58 ಮಂದಿ ಹಿ೦ದೂ ಶ್ರೀ ರಾಮ ಸೇವಕರನ್ನು ಸಜೀವ ವಾಗಿ ರೈಲಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಸುಟ್ಟು ಹಾಕಿದ್ದರಿಂದಲೇ ಗುಜರಾತ್ ಹಿಂಸಾಚಾರ ನಡೆದಿತ್ತು " (ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ನವರು ಈಗಲೂ ಈ ವಿಷಯವನ್ನು ಮರೆ ಮಾಚುತ್ತಾರೆ..ಏಕೆ೦ದರೆ ಅವರಿಗೆ ಹಿ೦ದೂ ಗಳ ಜೀವ ವೆ೦ದರೆ ಕ್ಷುಲ್ಲಕ ಜೀವ ಜ೦ತುಗಳ ಜೀವವಿದ್ದ೦ತೆ. ಇದ್ದರೆಷ್ಟು..ಹೋದರೆಷ್ಟು...? ಅದೇ ಅಲ್ಪಸ೦ಖ್ಯಾತರ ಜೀವ ಹಾನಿಯಾದರೇ  ಶಾಂತಂ ಪಾಪಂ...ಈ ಧರೆಯು ನಡುಗದಿರದೇ ? ಭಾರತ ಮಾತೆ ಮುನಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳ ದಿರಲಾರಳೇ ?

ಹೊಟ್ಟೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಮಗುವನ್ನು ತುಂಬಿಕೊಂಡಿದ್ದ ಮಹಿಳೆಯನ್ನು ಮೋದಿ ಕೊಂದರಾ?.... "ಅದೊಂದು ಹುಸಿ ಆರೋಪವೆಂಬುದು ಈ ವರ್ಷ ತಾನೇ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಮುಂದೆ ಬಹಿರಂಗವಾಗಿದೆ!" ....."ತನಿಖೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಪತ್ತೆಯಾದಂತೆ ಸಾಮಾಜಿಕ ಕಾರ್ಯಕರ್ತೆ " ತೀಸ್ತಾ ಸೆತಲ್ವಾಡ್  " ಇಂಥದ್ದೊಂದು ಕಟ್ಟುಕಥೆಯ ಸೃಷ್ಟಿಕರ್ತೆ" ಎಂಬ .

ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ನ ಇತ್ತೀಚಿನ ಆರೋಪವನ್ನೇ ನೋಡಿ...ಅದರ ಪ್ರಕಾರ ....ಬಹುಶಃ ಈ ದೇಶಕ್ಕೆ ಆಸ್ತಿಯಾಗಬಲ್ಲಂಥ ಅಥವಾ ಭವ್ಯ ಭವಿಷ್ಯ ಹೊಂದಿದ್ದ ಯುವಕರಾದ " ಇಶ್ರತ್ ಜಹಾನ್"  ಹಾಗೂ " ಜಾವೆದ್‌ " ರನ್ನು ಮೋದಿ ಕೊಲ್ಲುವ೦ತೆ ಪೋಲಿಸರಿಗೆ  ಆದೇಶ ನೀಡಿದ್ದರ೦ತೆ ...ಅದೂ ಹಾಡ ಹಗಲೇ ? ಛೇ.... ಈ ವಿಷಯದಲ್ಲಾದರೂ ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ನ ಆಪಾದನೆ ನಿಜವಾಯಿತೇ...? ಇಲ್ಲ..   ಅಂತಾರಾಷ್ಟ್ರೀಯ ಕುಖ್ಯಾತಿ ಗಳಿಸಿದ ಭಯೋತ್ಪಾದನೆ ಪಿತೂರಿದಾರ ಡೆವಿಡ್ ಹೆಡ್ಲಿ,... "ಇಶ್ರತ್ ಹಾಗೂ ಜಾವೆದ್ 'ಫಿದಾಯೀನ್‌'ಗಳು (ಆತ್ಮಹತ್ಯಾ ದಾಳಿಕೋರರು) ಮತ್ತು ಅವರನ್ನು ಮೋದಿಯನ್ನು ಕೊಲ್ಲಲು ಕಳುಹಿಸಲಾಗಿತ್ತು" ಎಂದು ನುಡಿದು ಬಿಟ್ಟನಲ್ಲ..ಅಲ್ಲಿಗೆ ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಗೆ ಮತ್ತೊ೦ದು ಮುಖಭ೦ಗ...!

ಈ ಮಧ್ಯೆ ಹಗಲೂ ರಾತ್ರಿಯೆನ್ನದೆ ಗುಜರಾತ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಏಕೆ ಕೋಮು ಹಿಂಸಾಚಾರಗಳು ನಡೆಯುತ್ತವೆ ಎ೦ಬ೦ತೆ ಮಾತನಾಡುತ್ತಿರುವ  ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಪಕ್ಷದ ನಾಯಕಮಣಿಗಳ ಮಾತನ್ನು ಸೀರಿಯಸ್ಸಾಗಿ ತೆಗೆದು ಕೊಳ್ಳೋಣವಾ ?

ಭಾರತದಲ್ಲಿ ನಡೆದಿದ್ದು ಗುಜರಾತ್ ಹಿಂಸಾಚಾರವೊಂದೆಯೇ? ... ಹಳೆಯ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆಗಳ  ದಾಖಲೆಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ನಿಮಗೇ ನಿಜಸ೦ಗತಿ ತಿಳಿಯುತ್ತದೆ...,

1947 ರಿಂದೀಚೆಗೆ ಇಂಥ ನೂರಾರು ಕೋಮು ಹಿಂಸಾಚಾರಗಳು ನಡೆದಿದ್ದವು. ಸುಮಾರು 4 ಸಾವಿರಕ್ಕೂ ಅಮಾಯಕ ಜನರು ಪ್ರಾಣ ಕಳೆದುಕೊಂಡ ಸಿಖ್ ಹತ್ಯಾಕಾಂಡ (ಇ೦ದಿರಾ ಹತ್ಯೆ ಯಾದಾಗ ) ಕೂಡಾ ನಡೆದಿತ್ತು ( ಇದನ್ನು ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ನೆನೆಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲೂ ಭಯಪಡುತ್ತದೆ )...ಸಿಕ್ಖರ ಓಟುಗಳು ಕರಗಿಯಾವಲ್ಲ ) .ಆ ಘಟನೆಯಲ್ಲೂ  ಮೋದಿ ಇದ್ದನೇ ?  ನಾವಿನ್ನೂ ಕಂಡು ಹುಡುಕಲಾಗಿಲ್ಲ, ಯಾವ ಮಾಧ್ಯಮಗಳೂ ಇದುವರೆಗೆ ಸಿಖ್ ಹತ್ಯಾಕಾಂಡದ ಬೆನ್ನು ಬಿದ್ದಿಲ್ಲ ?!

ಇನ್ನು  ಬೋಫೋರ್ಸ್, ಆ೦ಡರ್‌ಸನ್, ಕಾಮನ್ವೆಲ್ತ್‌, ಕೋಲ್ ಗೇಟ್ ಹಗರಣ ಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಯೆತ್ತಿದರೆ ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಗೆ ಕೆ೦ಗಣ್ಣು....ಇನ್ನು ಭಾರತದ ಅಳಿಯ " ರಾಬರ್ಟ ವಾಧ್ರಾ " ನ ಭೂಕಬಳಿಕೆ ಮತ್ತು ಇತರ ಹಗರಣಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ  ಉತ್ತರವಿರಲಿಲ್ಲ!!

ಮೋದಿಯಲ್ಲೊಬ್ಬ ಕೊಲೆಗಡುಕನನ್ನು ಹುಡುಕುವ  ಪ್ರಯತ್ನ ಮಾಡಿ ನೋಡಿ...ನಿಮಗೆ ಯಶಸ್ಸು ಯಶಸ್ಸು ಸಿಗುವುದಿಲ್ಲ. " ಸೊಹ್ರಾಬುದ್ದೀನ್ ಶೇಖ್ "  ಎಂಬ 'ಹುತಾತ್ಮ'ನ ವಿಷಯ ವನ್ನೇ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳಿ . ಓಹೋ, ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಸಿಕ್ಕಿಬಿದ್ದರು ಮೋದಿ ಅವರ  ಗೃಹ ಸಚಿವನೇ ಸಿಕ್ಕಿಬಿದ್ದಿದ್ದಾನೆ ನೋಡಿ.. ಕನಿಷ್ಠ ಈ ವಿಷಯದಲ್ಲಾದರೂ ಅಮಿತ್ ಶಾ ನುಣುಚಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಸಾಧ್ಯವಿರಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಜತೆಗೆ ಸುಪ್ರೀಂಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಕೂಡಾ ತನಿಖೆಗೆ ಆದೇಶ ನೀಡಿತ್ತು. ಆದರೆ ಇಲ್ಲೂ ನಿರಾಶೆ .... ಸುಪ್ರೀಂಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಸಿಬಿಐ ತನಿಖೆಗೆ ಆದೇಶ ನೀಡಿದೆ. ಏಕೆಂದರೆ 5 ರಾಜ್ಯಗಳಿಗೆ ಬೇಕಾದ ಭಯೋತ್ಪಾದಕ ಈ "  ಸೊಹ್ರಾಬುದ್ದೀನ್‌" .  ಸೊಹ್ರಾಬುದ್ದೀನ್ ದಾವೂದ್ ಇಬ್ರಾಹಿಂನ ಆಪ್ತ ಸಹಚರ ಹಾಗೂ ಕುಖ್ಯಾತ ಭಯೋತ್ಪಾದಕ ಎಂಬುದು ಅಮೆರಿಕ, ಭಾರತ ಹಾಗೂ ವಿಶ್ವಸಂಸ್ಥೆಯ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಮೂಲಕ ತಿಳಿದು ಬ೦ದಿದೆ ( ಅ೦ತರ್ಜಾಲದಲ್ಲಿ ಇದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಇದೆ ) . ಒಮ್ಮೆ 40 ಎಕೆ-47 ರೈಫಲ್‌ಗಳ ಜತೆ ಸಿಕ್ಕಿಬಿದ್ದಿದ್ದ  ಅವನನ್ನು ಪೋಲೀಸರು ಎನ್ಕೌಂಟರ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಕೊಂದುಹಾಕಿದ್ದರು.

ಇದೇನೆ ಇರಲಿ...

ಕಾ೦ಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಪಕ್ಷದ ಎ೦ಜಲು ತಿನ್ನುತ್ತಾ  ...ಕಳೆದ ಎಂಟು ವರ್ಷಗಳಿಂದ ಮೋದಿಯನ್ನು ಕ್ರಿಮಿನಲ್ ಎಂದು ಚಿತ್ರಿಸುತ್ತಾ ಬಂದಿದ್ದ ಮಾಧ್ಯಮಗಳಿಗೆ ಅದು ನಿಜವೆಂದು  ಮನವರಿಕೆ ಮಾಡಿಕೊಡಲು ಮಾತ್ರ ಸಾಧ್ಯವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ, ಇದೆಲ್ಲಕ್ಕಿ೦ತ ಮಿಗಿಲಾಗಿ ಸತತ ಮೊರು ಅವಧಿಗೆ ಮುಖ್ಯ ಮ೦ತ್ರಿ ಯಾದರೂ ನರೇ೦ದ್ರ ಮೋದಿಗೆ ಯಾವುದೇ ಬ್ರಷ್ಟಾಚಾರದ , ಅನಾಚಾರದ ಆರೋಪ ಮೆತ್ತಿಕೊ೦ಡಿಲ್ಲ. ಆತನ ಮ೦ತ್ರಿ ಮ೦ಡಲದ ಯಾವ ಮ೦ತ್ರಿಗಳ ಮೇಲೂ ಗ೦ಭೀರ ಆರೋಪಗಳಿಲ್ಲ...ನಮ್ಮ ಮು೦ದಿನ ಪ್ರಧಾನಿಯಾಗಲು ಇದಕ್ಕಿ೦ತ ಅರ್ಹತೆ ಬೇಕೆ...?

ಅದಕ್ಕೇ  ಯಾವ ಮಾಧ್ಯಮಗಳು ಮೋದಿಯನ್ನು ಇದುವರೆಗೂ ಕ್ರಿಮಿನಲ್ ಎಂದು ಚಿತ್ರಿಸುತ್ತಾ ಬಂದವೋ ಆ ಮಾಧ್ಯಮಗಳಿಗೆ ಮೋದಿಯೊಬ್ಬ ಕ್ರಿಮಿನಲ್ ಅಲ್ಲ ಹಾಗೂ ಆತ ಈ ದೇಶದ ಪ್ರಧಾನಿಯಾಗಲು ಅರ್ಹ  ಎಂದು ಮನವರಿಕೆ ಮಾಡಿಕೊಡಬೇಕಾದ ಹೊಣೆಗಾರಿಕೆ ಮಾತ್ರ ಖಂಡಿತಾ ಇದೆ....

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Congress Spreading  " Modi Phobia "  in Muslims....

Will they succeed....? 





This is an observation of a  Political Observer (Zafer Sureshwala) of Gujarat 




The political discourse in India led by Congress Party and its Media henchmen has so created a  Modi phobia among Muslim  that even if you express happiness at the quality of roads in rural Gujarat or 24×7 power supply in the villages and towns of Gujarat, you are branded a “supporter of fascism.

To say a word in appreciation of governance reforms in Gujarat is to commit political hara-kiri – you are forever tainted and tarred with the colour of fascism.

I also found it puzzling that almost all of those who have led the Hate Modi campaign are neither Muslims nor residents of Gujarat. Three of the most prominent figures of the anti-Modi Brigade from within Gujarat are not Muslims.

Then there are those Muslims who have hardly visited Gujarat and do nothing more than sit in TV studios either abusing Modi or abusing Muslims who work to build bridges. Some Hate Modi campaigners are those Muslims who don’t even visit India. Sitting in the US and UK, they run a five-star armchair criticism industry and don’t want to do anything tangible for the Muslims of Gujarat or anywhere.

Wherever a Gujarati Muslim has tried to speak in a different voice, he has been attacked viciously and made to pay such a heavy price that people just shut up in terror. 

The highly respected and eminent Muslim scholar, Maulana Vastanvi, was forced to resign as Vice-Chancellor of Deoband simply because he said Gujarati Muslims had benefited from the inclusive development policies of Modi’s government. Shahid Siddique, the editor of an Urdu daily, was attacked and abused endlessly for simply doing an interview with Modi in which Modi defends himself ably.

And now, very recently, noted scholar Zafar Mehmood from Delhi is being hounded for having a dialogue with Modi..  Zafar Mehmood had come to Gandhinagar to make a presentation as a Speaker at a Youth Conclave where Modi too was one of the speakers along with the ex-President of India, APJ Abdul Kalam, renowned banker Deepak Parekh and several others. Although his presentation was very scathing against the BJP and he put several questions regarding the Muslim development and state of the riot victims, he was still vilified just because he shared the stage with Modi.

Young Maulanas who had come to the Youth Conclave from Hyderabad were made targets too, to the extent that they had to give interviews to the media saying “ Have I committed a sin by meeting Modi?”.

The large number of Muslims included in the Youth Conclave was for the first time and it was not possible earlier. These are signs of changing times and new political evolution. And yet it would be very unfair to target this Youth Conclave as an exercise to present Modi. It was an apolitical conclave where Modi was rather a silent listener for the whole day and spoke only for a few minutes towards the end.

Over a period of time since 2003 interactions have been going on between Modi and various Muslim groups. Apart from his non-partisan schemes for all Gujaratis, Modi has extended his hand to interact with Muslims. So far more than 178 different groups of Muslims have met Modi on different occasions, taking their issues of schools, colleges, madarsas, jobs, jails, housing, etc, to him. Modi has every time heard the delegation patiently and has taken prompt action wherever required.

To one group he had said about 2002 that “yeh mere kaal kaa kalank hai, mujhe ise dhona hai.His actions have spoken more than words. Modi has expressed his remorse several times in the past during his television interviews and also at his victory speech on the 20th of December 2012, where he said: “Mere haathon se kisi ko bhi takleef pahunchi ho to mein kshama chahta hun“.

As recently as his latest interview given in late June to Reuters, Modi was compassionate and was expressing his pain. But, as usual, his remarks were unnecessarily distorted and maliciously presented by one and all. Muslims judge Modi by his actions and they will judge any other politician by what they do and not by what they say. T

The best parameter to judge a leader will be by his deeds. So the whole debate of saying sorry ends here. The consistent and growing electoral support to Modi from Gujarati Muslims shows that Muslims have already moved on. I would sum up this point in the words of Mahesh Bhatt, who said in 2012 why the Hate Modi closure in not happening.

Those who talk of secular values need to go back and study the Mahatma because in the pages of the Mahatma there is no concept of the kshatru (enmity).”
The political discourse in India is so vitiated by Modi phobia that even if you express happiness at the quality of roads in rural Gujarat or 24×7 power supply in the villages and towns of Gujarat, you are branded a “supporter of fascism.” To say a word in appreciation of governance reforms in Gujarat is to commit political hara-kiri – you are forever tainted and tarred with the colour of fascism. I also found it puzzling that almost all of those who have led the Hate Modi campaign are neither Muslims nor residents of Gujarat. Three of the most prominent figures of the anti-Modi Brigade from within Gujarat are not Muslims. Then there are those Muslims who have hardly visited Gujarat and do nothing more than sit in TV studios either abusing Modi or abusing Muslims who work to build bridges. Some Hate Modi campaigners are those Muslims who don’t even visit India. Sitting in the US and UK, they run a five-star armchair criticism industry and don’t want to do anything tangible for the Muslims of Gujarat or anywhere. Wherever a Gujarati Muslim has tried to speak in a different voice, he has been attacked viciously and made to pay such a heavy price that people just shut up in terror. The highly respected and eminent Muslim scholar, Maulana Vastanvi, was forced to resign as Vice-Chancellor of Deoband simply because he said Gujarati Muslims had benefited from the inclusive development policies of Modi’s government. Shahid Siddique, the editor of an Urdu daily, was attacked and abused endlessly for simply doing an interview with Modi in which Modi defends himself ably. And now, very recently, noted scholar Zafar Mehmood from Delhi is being hounded for having a dialogue with Modi. Zafar Mehmood had come to Gandhinagar to make a presentation as a Speaker at a Youth Conclave where Modi too was one of the speakers along with the ex-President of India, APJ Abdul Kalam, renowned banker Deepak Parekh and several others. Although his presentation was very scathing against the BJP and he put several questions regarding the Muslim development and state of the riot victims, he was still vilified just because he shared the stage with Modi. Young Maulanas who had come to the Youth Conclave from Hyderabad were made targets too, to the extent that they had to give interviews to the media saying “Have I committed a sin by meeting Modi?”. The large number of Muslims included in the Youth Conclave was for the first time and it was not possible earlier. These are signs of changing times and new political evolution. And yet it would be very unfair to target this Youth Conclave as an exercise to present Modi. It was an apolitical conclave where Modi was rather a silent listener for the whole day and spoke only for a few minutes towards the end. Over a period of time since 2003 interactions have been going on between Modi and various Muslim groups. Apart from his non-partisan schemes for all Gujaratis, Modi has extended his hand to interact with Muslims. So far more than 178 different groups of Muslims have met Modi on different occasions, taking their issues of schools, colleges, madarsas, jobs, jails, housing, etc, to him. Modi has every time heard the delegation patiently and has taken prompt action wherever required. To one group he had said about 2002 that “yeh mere kaal kaa kalank hai, mujhe ise dhona hai.” His actions have spoken more than words. Modi has expressed his remorse several times in the past during his television interviews and also at his victory speech on the 20th of December 2012, where he said: “Mere haathon se kisi ko bhi takleef pahunchi ho to mein kshama chahta hun“. As recently as his latest interview given in late June to Reuters, Modi was compassionate and was expressing his pain. But, as usual, his remarks were unnecessarily distorted and maliciously presented by one and all. Muslims judge Modi by his actions and they will judge any other politician by what they do and not by what they say. The best parameter to judge a leader will be by his deeds. So the whole debate of saying sorry ends here. The consistent and growing electoral support to Modi from Gujarati Muslims shows that Muslims have already moved on. I would sum up this point in the words of Mahesh Bhatt, who said in 2012 why the Hate Modi closure in not happening. “Unfortunately, there are some conflict entrepreneurs who live off conflicts. Like, the war industries would cease to exist if human hatred evaporated. They have a tremendous investment in this hatred, so to keep the demon alive is to keep their God alive. They draw sustenance from this hatred. Those who talk of secular values need to go back and study the Mahatma because in the pages of the Mahatma there is no concept of the kshatru (enmity).” (Zafar Sareshwala is a Gujarat businessman who has confronted Modi on 2002, but later decided to build bridges with the Gujarat government in order to be of practical help to the community.)

Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/modi-and-muslims-a-discourse-destroyed-by-modi-phobia-958269.html?utm_source=ref_article
The political discourse in India is so vitiated by Modi phobia that even if you express happiness at the quality of roads in rural Gujarat or 24×7 power supply in the villages and towns of Gujarat, you are branded a “supporter of fascism.” To say a word in appreciation of governance reforms in Gujarat is to commit political hara-kiri – you are forever tainted and tarred with the colour of fascism. I also found it puzzling that almost all of those who have led the Hate Modi campaign are neither Muslims nor residents of Gujarat. Three of the most prominent figures of the anti-Modi Brigade from within Gujarat are not Muslims. Then there are those Muslims who have hardly visited Gujarat and do nothing more than sit in TV studios either abusing Modi or abusing Muslims who work to build bridges. Some Hate Modi campaigners are those Muslims who don’t even visit India. Sitting in the US and UK, they run a five-star armchair criticism industry and don’t want to do anything tangible for the Muslims of Gujarat or anywhere. Wherever a Gujarati Muslim has tried to speak in a different voice, he has been attacked viciously and made to pay such a heavy price that people just shut up in terror. The highly respected and eminent Muslim scholar, Maulana Vastanvi, was forced to resign as Vice-Chancellor of Deoband simply because he said Gujarati Muslims had benefited from the inclusive development policies of Modi’s government. Shahid Siddique, the editor of an Urdu daily, was attacked and abused endlessly for simply doing an interview with Modi in which Modi defends himself ably. And now, very recently, noted scholar Zafar Mehmood from Delhi is being hounded for having a dialogue with Modi. Zafar Mehmood had come to Gandhinagar to make a presentation as a Speaker at a Youth Conclave where Modi too was one of the speakers along with the ex-President of India, APJ Abdul Kalam, renowned banker Deepak Parekh and several others. Although his presentation was very scathing against the BJP and he put several questions regarding the Muslim development and state of the riot victims, he was still vilified just because he shared the stage with Modi. Young Maulanas who had come to the Youth Conclave from Hyderabad were made targets too, to the extent that they had to give interviews to the media saying “Have I committed a sin by meeting Modi?”. The large number of Muslims included in the Youth Conclave was for the first time and it was not possible earlier. These are signs of changing times and new political evolution. And yet it would be very unfair to target this Youth Conclave as an exercise to present Modi. It was an apolitical conclave where Modi was rather a silent listener for the whole day and spoke only for a few minutes towards the end. Over a period of time since 2003 interactions have been going on between Modi and various Muslim groups. Apart from his non-partisan schemes for all Gujaratis, Modi has extended his hand to interact with Muslims. So far more than 178 different groups of Muslims have met Modi on different occasions, taking their issues of schools, colleges, madarsas, jobs, jails, housing, etc, to him. Modi has every time heard the delegation patiently and has taken prompt action wherever required. To one group he had said about 2002 that “yeh mere kaal kaa kalank hai, mujhe ise dhona hai.” His actions have spoken more than words. Modi has expressed his remorse several times in the past during his television interviews and also at his victory speech on the 20th of December 2012, where he said: “Mere haathon se kisi ko bhi takleef pahunchi ho to mein kshama chahta hun“. As recently as his latest interview given in late June to Reuters, Modi was compassionate and was expressing his pain. But, as usual, his remarks were unnecessarily distorted and maliciously presented by one and all. Muslims judge Modi by his actions and they will judge any other politician by what they do and not by what they say. The best parameter to judge a leader will be by his deeds. So the whole debate of saying sorry ends here. The consistent and growing electoral support to Modi from Gujarati Muslims shows that Muslims have already moved on. I would sum up this point in the words of Mahesh Bhatt, who said in 2012 why the Hate Modi closure in not happening. “Unfortunately, there are some conflict entrepreneurs who live off conflicts. Like, the war industries would cease to exist if human hatred evaporated. They have a tremendous investment in this hatred, so to keep the demon alive is to keep their God alive. They draw sustenance from this hatred. Those who talk of secular values need to go back and study the Mahatma because in the pages of the Mahatma there is no concept of the kshatru (enmity).”

Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/modi-and-muslims-a-discourse-destroyed-by-modi-phobia-958269.html?utm_source=ref_article
The political discourse in India is so vitiated by Modi phobia that even if you express happiness at the quality of roads in rural Gujarat or 24×7 power supply in the villages and towns of Gujarat, you are branded a “supporter of fascism.” To say a word in appreciation of governance reforms in Gujarat is to commit political hara-kiri – you are forever tainted and tarred with the colour of fascism.

Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/modi-and-muslims-a-discourse-destroyed-by-modi-phobia-958269.html?utm_source=ref_article
The political discourse in India is so vitiated by Modi phobia that even if you express happiness at the quality of roads in rural Gujarat or 24×7 power supply in the villages and towns of Gujarat, you are branded a “supporter of fascism.” To say a word in appreciation of governance reforms in Gujarat is to commit political hara-kiri – you are forever tainted and tarred with the colour of fascism. I also found it puzzling that almost all of those who have led the Hate Modi campaign are neither Muslims nor residents of Gujarat. Three of the most prominent figures of the anti-Modi Brigade from within Gujarat are not Muslims. Then there are those Muslims who have hardly visited Gujarat and do nothing more than sit in TV studios either abusing Modi or abusing Muslims who work to build bridges. Some Hate Modi campaigners are those Muslims who don’t even visit India. Sitting in the US and UK, they run a five-star armchair criticism industry and don’t want to do anything tangible for the Muslims of Gujarat or anywhere. Wherever a Gujarati Muslim has tried to speak in a different voice, he has been attacked viciously and made to pay such a heavy price that people just shut up in terror. The highly respected and eminent Muslim scholar, Maulana Vastanvi, was forced to resign as Vice-Chancellor of Deoband simply because he said Gujarati Muslims had benefited from the inclusive development policies of Modi’s government. Shahid Siddique, the editor of an Urdu daily, was attacked and abused endlessly for simply doing an interview with Modi in which Modi defends himself ably. And now, very recently, noted scholar Zafar Mehmood from Delhi is being hounded for having a dialogue with Modi. Zafar Mehmood had come to Gandhinagar to make a presentation as a Speaker at a Youth Conclave where Modi too was one of the speakers along with the ex-President of India, APJ Abdul Kalam, renowned banker Deepak Parekh and several others. Although his presentation was very scathing against the BJP and he put several questions regarding the Muslim development and state of the riot victims, he was still vilified just because he shared the stage with Modi. Young Maulanas who had come to the Youth Conclave from Hyderabad were made targets too, to the extent that they had to give interviews to the media saying “Have I committed a sin by meeting Modi?”. The large number of Muslims included in the Youth Conclave was for the first time and it was not possible earlier. These are signs of changing times and new political evolution. And yet it would be very unfair to target this Youth Conclave as an exercise to present Modi. It was an apolitical conclave where Modi was rather a silent listener for the whole day and spoke only for a few minutes towards the end. Over a period of time since 2003 interactions have been going on between Modi and various Muslim groups. Apart from his non-partisan schemes for all Gujaratis, Modi has extended his hand to interact with Muslims. So far more than 178 different groups of Muslims have met Modi on different occasions, taking their issues of schools, colleges, madarsas, jobs, jails, housing, etc, to him. Modi has every time heard the delegation patiently and has taken prompt action wherever required. To one group he had said about 2002 that “yeh mere kaal kaa kalank hai, mujhe ise dhona hai.” His actions have spoken more than words. Modi has expressed his remorse several times in the past during his television interviews and also at his victory speech on the 20th of December 2012, where he said: “Mere haathon se kisi ko bhi takleef pahunchi ho to mein kshama chahta hun“. As recently as his latest interview given in late June to Reuters, Modi was compassionate and was expressing his pain. But, as usual, his remarks were unnecessarily distorted and maliciously presented by one and all. Muslims judge Modi by his actions and they will judge any other politician by what they do and not by what they say. The best parameter to judge a leader will be by his deeds. So the whole debate of saying sorry ends here. The consistent and growing electoral support to Modi from Gujarati Muslims shows that Muslims have already moved on. I would sum up this point in the words of Mahesh Bhatt, who said in 2012 why the Hate Modi closure in not happening. “Unfortunately, there are some conflict entrepreneurs who live off conflicts. Like, the war industries would cease to exist if human hatred evaporated. They have a tremendous investment in this hatred, so to keep the demon alive is to keep their God alive. They draw sustenance from this hatred. Those who talk of secular values need to go back and study the Mahatma because in the pages of the Mahatma there is no concept of the kshatru (enmity).” (Zafar Sareshwala is a Gujarat businessman who has confronted Modi on 2002, but later decided to build bridges with the Gujarat government in order to be of practical help to the community.)

Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/modi-and-muslims-a-discourse-destroyed-by-modi-phobia-958269.html?utm_source=ref_article
The political discourse in India is so vitiated by Modi phobia that even if you express happiness at the quality of roads in rural Gujarat or 24×7 power supply in the villages and towns of Gujarat, you are branded a “supporter of fascism.” To say a word in appreciation of governance reforms in Gujarat is to commit political hara-kiri – you are forever tainted and tarred with the colour of fascism. I also found it puzzling that almost all of those who have led the Hate Modi campaign are neither Muslims nor residents of Gujarat. Three of the most prominent figures of the anti-Modi Brigade from within Gujarat are not Muslims. Then there are those Muslims who have hardly visited Gujarat and do nothing more than sit in TV studios either abusing Modi or abusing Muslims who work to build bridges. Some Hate Modi campaigners are those Muslims who don’t even visit India. Sitting in the US and UK, they run a five-star armchair criticism industry and don’t want to do anything tangible for the Muslims of Gujarat or anywhere. Wherever a Gujarati Muslim has tried to speak in a different voice, he has been attacked viciously and made to pay such a heavy price that people just shut up in terror. The highly respected and eminent Muslim scholar, Maulana Vastanvi, was forced to resign as Vice-Chancellor of Deoband simply because he said Gujarati Muslims had benefited from the inclusive development policies of Modi’s government. Shahid Siddique, the editor of an Urdu daily, was attacked and abused endlessly for simply doing an interview with Modi in which Modi defends himself ably. And now, very recently, noted scholar Zafar Mehmood from Delhi is being hounded for having a dialogue with Modi. Zafar Mehmood had come to Gandhinagar to make a presentation as a Speaker at a Youth Conclave where Modi too was one of the speakers along with the ex-President of India, APJ Abdul Kalam, renowned banker Deepak Parekh and several others. Although his presentation was very scathing against the BJP and he put several questions regarding the Muslim development and state of the riot victims, he was still vilified just because he shared the stage with Modi. Young Maulanas who had come to the Youth Conclave from Hyderabad were made targets too, to the extent that they had to give interviews to the media saying “Have I committed a sin by meeting Modi?”. The large number of Muslims included in the Youth Conclave was for the first time and it was not possible earlier. These are signs of changing times and new political evolution. And yet it would be very unfair to target this Youth Conclave as an exercise to present Modi. It was an apolitical conclave where Modi was rather a silent listener for the whole day and spoke only for a few minutes towards the end.

Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/modi-and-muslims-a-discourse-destroyed-by-modi-phobia-958269.html?utm_source=ref_article